Monday, July 25, 2016

Infrastructure

Strong infrastructure is critical to a strong economy.  Infrastructure refers to the services and facilities a society needs for the economy to function.  This could include roads, bridges, water supply, sewers, power grids, public transit, and telecommunications like the internet.  11% of the American workforce today is employed in infrastructure sectors.  According to the White House Council of Economic Advisors, every $1 billion in infrastructure investment creates 13,000 jobs.  Every dollar of infrastructure investment leads to an estimated $1.60 increase in the GDP the following year and twice that over the subsequent 20 years.  


Federal infrastructure investment is about half of what it was when I was born (35 years ago).  The American Society of Civil Engineers estimated that about 3.6 trillion would be needed by 2020 to make the country’s infrastructure “acceptable.”


Some of the problems our country faces due to lack of infrastructure investment include traffic congestion, threats of floods, airport delays, and difficulty of businesses and farmers getting goods to customers due to all of the above.  It is estimated that car maintenance due to the “pothole tax” costs American families $500 per year.  Rush-hour commuters waste 42 hours in traffic each year costing an extra $1,000 in fuel, not to mention loss of time with families, and the effects on the environment as a result.  More than 1 in 5 flights are delayed or cancelled.  As consumers, we pay more for everything from food to furniture due to these congestion and delays of freight.


Some say infrastructure is the key to wiping out poverty as the addition of roads or public transit brings people closer to employment options and better healthcare.  Poor infrastructure disproportionately affects low-income communities.    People needing to travel more than an hour to work or using inefficient public transport find it difficult to get and keep a job.  Access to jobs through affordable transit is one of the most powerful mobilizers in connecting people to work, school, or just daily errands like the grocery store or the bank.


I can’t possibly say it better than the editor-in-chief of the U.S. News & World Report, Mortimer B. Zuckerman, as he stated in this April 1, 2016 article entitled, “Rebuild America: Invest in Infrastructure to Boost Jobs & the Economy


“Americans expect that our roads and bridges and trains will get us to our destination without injury, that our airports are modern and safe, our tap water is clean and our dams and levies won't burst when it rains. But in 2012, there were nearly a quarter-million water main breaks and we may be losing more than 2 trillion gallons of treated drinking water each year in part due to leaking pipes and faulty meters. Think of the shame of Flint.


Rebuilding America – a private, public and policy coalition – aims to support millions, as many as 13 million, good-paying jobs, jobs that our economy needs. We spend less than 3 percent of GDP on infrastructure, while Europe spends close to twice our rate, and China three times our rate, according to statistics frequently cited by politicians. In 2012, one out of every nine bridges in our country were structurally deficient and nearly a quarter were functionally obsolete. Roughly a third of our roads were in poor or mediocre condition and more than 42 percent of all urban highways were congested.”


Here is where the candidates stand on the issue.


Clinton:  Clinton has announced an extensive $275 billion 5 year plan to rebuild America’s infrastructure.  She would like to pass this plan within her first 100 days in office.  This plan includes:
  • repairing and expanding roads and bridges in order to make them more structurally sound and reduce congestion
  • expanding public transit, especially in low-income areas, to connect workers with affordable transportation to get them to jobs
  • connecting all families to the internet by 2020 by offering affordable broadband and investing in new resources to bring free Wi-Fi to public buildings and public transportation.
  • modernizing our national airspace system and airports which also reduces carbon emissions and will save travelers and airlines and estimated $100 billion in avoided delays over the next 15 years.
  • modernizing dams, levees, and wastewater systems, saving billions of gallons in clean drinking water and generating clean energy.
She pays for this plan through business tax reform.


Trump:  Trump has put forth no official plan for infrastructure on his website.  However, in his book released last year, Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again, he says that “fixing the country’s infrastructure would be a major priority project...When you talk about building, you better talk about Trump.”  He hasn’t put forth an official policy, but he described it as a trillion dollar rebuilding plan and claims it would create 13 million jobs.  He likens it to FDR’s New Deal which is responsible for creating the Public Works Administration which was responsible for major infrastructure investment beginning in the 1930’s.




Thursday, July 14, 2016

Immigration Reform

I am a 4th generation Norwegian immigrant on my Mom’s side.  Her maternal grandparents came here from Norway.  I can’t trace the rest as precisely, but I do know this.  If you go back enough generations, my ancestors weren’t born on this land.  They all came over from Europe.  And, I’m a total mutt at this point so I don’t call myself a Norwegian American or a German American, or whatever else might be in me.  I just call myself an American.  It’s all sort of blended together, or melted.  Kind of like a melting pot.

What makes me proud to be an American can be summed up in one word: welcome.  The Statue of Liberty could just as easily and naturally be referred to as the Mother of Exiles.  This is the land we came to for an opportunity at enlightenment, improvement, advancement, and freedom from oppression.  This is the land we came to in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

What makes me proud to be a follower of Christ can also be summed up in one word: one.  That’s the word.  As in, we are all one.  How I treat my neighbor is how I treat myself.

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.  Send these, the tempest-tost to me.”

“For when I was hungry, you gave me something to eat.  When I was thirsty, you gave me something to drink.  When I was a stranger, you invited me in.  I needed clothes and you clothed me.  I was sick and you looked after me.  I was a prisoner and you came to visit me.”

One of these quotes comes from the plaque upon the Statue of Liberty, Mother of Exiles.  The other comes from the mouth of Jesus.  Both contribute to how I strive to treat others and how I believe our laws should strive to treat others.

The topic of immigration reform is expensive and exhausting.  I’ve been researching it for a while now and feel like I have barely scratched the surface.  Like many complex issues, there is no way to really simplify it and do it justice at the same time.  But, if I had to, it comes down to finding a compromise between a path to citizenship for well-intended individuals and families while securing borders from actual threats.  Additionally, the system has lacked reform for such a long time, that the pathway to citizenship is wrought with roadblocks forcing many into undocumented status not because they want to be, but because there is no other option.  Millions are contributing positively to society and the economy and may even have family members with that are legal citizens, but fear being sent back and having their family torn apart because the pathway to citizenship is so broken.

Here is one example of the broken system.  Let’s say you are here as an undocumented immigrant.  Maybe you came here legally as a tourist or on a temporary visa, and didn’t leave.  Or maybe you’re on the waitlist due to annual limits and your parents or children are legal, but you’re not.  Or, maybe you even came here illegally to escape danger in your own country.  You may have relatives with legal status or even want to marry a U.S. citizen.  One way or another, you are illegally here.  Well, in order to apply for a green card, you have to leave the country.  And, once you do, you are banned from returning to the country for 3 to 10 years because you were previously in the U.S. illegally.  So, you stay...illegally.

Here is what I have discovered.  It is universally agreed upon that our immigration system is broken.  There is a lot of fear and ignorance around who immigrants are, why they are here, and how they contribute to society and one of our presidential candidates is doing a tremendous job of playing on those fears and that ignorance.  There is just as much fear and ignorance around who refugees are, why they are here, and how they contribute to society.  I did find this Myths vs. Facts sheet helpful in debunking some of those damaging falsehoods such as, “They’re taking our jobs,” “They drain our economy,” “They don’t pay taxes,” “They take advantage of our welfare system,” and “They’re criminals.”   I think that is a good starting point for anyone who wants to understand the facts about immigrants.  If you don’t want to read the 20 pages though, let me give you the short version: those are myths perpetuated to keep “others” out.

Does this mean, let anyone and everyone in, no questions ask?  Of course not.  Granted, Jesus might say yes, but is we were all so Christ-like, we probably wouldn’t need to have this conversation in the first place.  There are criminals out there.  There are terrorists out there.  Security matters.  We can be welcoming and secure at the same time.

Here are some key historical efforts before we go on that show how complicated it is to pass immigration reform.  All had the basic foundation of providing a path to citizenship and securing our borders.

Secure American and Orderly Immigration Act:  Introduced to the Senate by John McCain (R-AZ) & Ted Kennedy (D-MA) in 2005.  Never voted on but led to the following bills.

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006:  Introduced the Senate by Arlen Specter (R-PA*) and co-sponsored by McCain, Kennedy, & 4 others.  Passed the Senate but the House & Senate could not come to an agreement so it never became law.

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007:  This was another bipartisan compromise between providing a path to citizenship and increased border enforcement.  It also failed.

DREAM Act:  (Development, Relief, & Education for Alien Minors)  First introduced by Dick Durbin (D-IL) & Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in 2001.  This was essentially a path to citizenship bill if a candidate meets the requirements.  Supporters argue numerous social and economic benefits.  Critics argue that it rewards the undocumented and encourages more immigration.  It has been introduced numerous times since then but has yet to be passed.

Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013:  This is a bill written and negotiated by the “Gang of Eight” which includes 4 democrat senators and 4 republican senators.  It passed the Senate, but has not been acted up in the House.  It was another blend of path to citizenship and border security.  In addition, it was predicted to reduce the deficit by raising more revenue than it would cost.



DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals):  DACA was started by the Obama administration in June of 2012 as a way to allow undocumented immigrants that entered before their 16th birthday and before June of 2007 to receive a renewable two year work permit and exemption from deportation.  By June of 2007, it had granted DACA status to 581,000 and denied it to 24,000.  This was an executive action in response to the failure of the DREAM Act.  It currently stands, but expansions of the program proposed in November 2014 are currently blocked due to lawsuits (recently heard by the Supreme Court).

DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Immigrants):  This was another executive action announced in November 2014 to grant deferred action status to certain undocumented immigrants who have children who are American citizens or lawful permanent residents.  Deferred action is not full legal status, but it does come with a three year renewable work permit and exemption from deportation.  This is currently blocked due to lawsuits that have reached the Supreme Court.



Here is where the candidates stand.

Clinton:  Clinton’s plan is extensive.  This is just a portion of it.  Clinton supported all of the above bills that she was a Senator for and supports Obama’s executive actions, DACA & DAPA.  She says she will fight for comprehensive reform that provides a full and equal path to citizenship, treats every person with dignity, upholds the rule of law, protects our borders and national security, and brings millions of hardworking people into the formal economy.  Clinton wants to end the 3 to 10 year bans for re-entry.

She proposes creating a National Office of Immigrant Affairs to ensure successful immigrant and refugee integration in every community.  She believes that families who want to purchase health insurance should be able to do so and should be able to buy into the Affordable Care Act exchanges.

Concerning immigration enforcement, she believes it should be humane and targeted.  She will focus enforcement resources on detaining and deporting those individuals who pose a violent threat to public safety, and work to ensure refugees who seek asylum in the U.S. have a fair chance to tell their stories.  Hillary believes we should end family detention for parents and children who arrive at our border in desperate situations. She says we have alternatives to detention for those who pose no flight or public safety risk, such as supervised release, that have proved effective and cost a fraction of what it takes to keep families in detention.  She will end private immigrant detention centers. She believes we should move away from contracting out this critical government function to private corporations and private industry incentives that may contribute—or have the appearance of contributing—to over-incarceration.

Trump:  This is probably the most central issue of Donald Trump’s platform.  This is what he is running on, and this is why his followers love him.  This is what they chant about at his rallies.  Donald Trump wants to build a wall along the Mexican border and he wants Mexico to pay for it.  He is serious about this.  Of the seven positions he outlines on his website (to Clinton’s 32), “Pay for the Wall” and “Immigration Reform” are 2 of them.  He has an elaborate plan to make Mexico pay for the wall.

He was against the bill written by the Gang of Eight and outlines three core principles in his immigration reform: physical borders including a physical wall between Mexico & the US, enforcement of current laws, and improvement of jobs, wages, and security for legal Americans.

He wants to triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.  He supports detention centers at our borders, enacting stricter penalties for those overstaying their visas, and an end birthright citizenship.

I can’t even bring myself to outline the rest of his program.  It plays on every single immigrant myth there is (which he calls aliens, by the way). It paints them as criminals, welfare abusers, and essentially the cause of every problem in our country real or imagined.  If his claims were true, who wouldn’t vote for him?  But, their not.  Politifact has rated him “pants on fire” more than any other candidate.  78% of what he has said has been proven false.  He is doing a tremendous job on playing on imaginary fears.

Here are those excessively false statements (just the extreme ones) on immigration.  Click on them to find out the truth:



From a Trump ad that shows footage from Morocco instead of Mexico:  A Trump television ad shows Mexicans swarming over "our southern border."





When you put all of these together, it sounds like  pretty dire situation and he is getting a lot of traction by creating these fears and then pandering to them.  But, they are completely false.  Completely.

HIV/AIDS

Originally posted on Tuesday, July 5, 2016.

The election is 18 weeks from today.  This post will echo my first post in many ways as it relates to an issue that many people probably don’t think of as a political issue.  It certainly doesn’t get a lot of debate.  So, here are some reiterated facts from my first post which was on Alzheimer’s Disease.
The United States Health Department funds the National Institutes of Health as the primary agency of the United States government responsible for biomedical and health-related research.  The NIH’s budget is around 32 billion out of about a 3.7 trillion dollar national budget (less than 1%).
The 2016 spending bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama at the end of 2015 saw a 6.6% increase to the NIH’s budget which is the largest increase in 12 years (though it is still relatively underfunded).
So, medical research is a political issue.  It is often overlooked politically even though it is an important part of our government function.
There are 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States with 50,000 new cases diagnosed each year.  On July 13, 2010, the White House released the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) as the “nation’s first ever comprehensive coordinated HIV/AIDS roadmap with clear and measurable targets to be achieved.”
Where do the candidates stand on it?
Clinton:  Clinton believes and AIDS-free generation is within our reach.  She will increase investment in HIV/AIDS research, secure affordable treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS by capping out of pocket expenses for people living with the disease, and reform laws and policies discriminating on the basis of HIV status.  She will work to fully implement the National HIV/AIDS Strategy.  She will also increase global funding for HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention.
Clinton has a plan for holding the pharmaceutical industry accountable and lower the cost of prescription drugs for ALL Americans, not just those with HIV.  It includes capping monthly and annual out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs at $250 among other things.
She will also increase CDC investment to increase knowledge and usage of the drug PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) which has proved effective in preventing HIV infections.
She will fight to extend Medicaid coverage to provide life-saving health care to people living with HIV. Of the 70,000 people living with HIV who were uninsured before the Affordable Care Act (ACA), roughly 47,000 were supposed to be newly eligible for Medicaid. However, the refusal of some states to expand Medicaid coverage (which I discussed in my last post) has left many of them ineligible. Hillary will fight until every state expands Medicaid coverage to provide life-saving health care to people living with HIV.
Once again, her experience as first lady, senator, and secretary of state pay off here as she has worked globally on this issue, put forth legislation, and launched federal campaigns.
Trump:  Trump does not address any medical research support on his website.  A search for Donald Trump’s views on HIV/AIDS research and support yield numerous results about Trump accidentally contracting HIV as the butt of a joke in a new Sacha Baron Cohen movie, “The Brother’s Grimsby.”

Health Care

Originally posted to Facebook on July 2, 2015.

Before this week’s issue, a note.  In truth, I started this little experiment to convince myself that no matter who became president, everything would be okay.  I wanted to move past the rhetoric and dig into the issues.  I wanted to understand all sides of every issue, so I have spent a lot of time reading opinions and articles from sources that I knew I wouldn’t immediately agree with.  The result:  I used to believe all people were good and generally wanted the same thing.  Now, I’m not so sure.  Maybe I’ll have more on that in another post.  For now, health care.

Health care.  Is it a basic human right or a for profit industry?  What is ObamaCare?  What is Medicaid?  Why are premiums so high?  There is a lot wrong with today’s health care system.  But, why?  In this post, I give an overview of Obamacare and Medicaid before offering where the candidates stand and providing my own bottom line.

Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) more commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare is the most significant overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system since the introduction of Medicaid & Medicare in 1965.  It was signed into law by Barack Obama on March 23, 2010.  It was a major part Obama’s candidacy platform for presidency.  It was intended to increase the quality and affordability of health care insurance and to lower the uninsured number.

Here are some of the more significant changes introduced by the law:

Protections for policyholders:
  • Insurers can no longer deny coverage to patients due to pre-existing conditions.
  • Insurers can no longer impose lifetime dollar amounts on essential benefits, such as hospital stays.
  • It can no longer drop policyholders when they get sick.
  • It established minimum standards for health care policies.
  • Plans must cover preventative care and medical screenings and cannot charge co-pays or deductibles for these services.

Expanded protections:
  • It expanded Medicaid eligibility.
  • It allowed children to stay on their parents insurance until their 26th birthday.

Streamlined Services:
  • Introduced health insurance exchanges as an on-line avenue where individuals and small businesses can compare plans before purchasing during open enrollment.
  • Reforms and streamlines the payments system through Medicare.

Penalties for Non-Compliance:
  • It mandates insurance coverage unless an individual experiences financial hardship or is a member of a protected religious sect.  Subsidies are available to help low income individuals.
  • It enacted tax penalties for businesses (with 50 or more employees) who do not offer coverage for full-time employees but receives tax deductions for such a purpose.
  • Penalizes hospitals with a higher than expected readmission rate due to the costs they incur to Medicare by decreasing their Medicare reimbursement rate.

Why people love it.
Most Americans benefit from the Affordable Care Act.  The inability of an insurance company to refuse people with pre-existing conditions has been life changing for many.  A member of my own family paid $800 a month due to a pre-existing heart condition because no insurance company would take him except the state.  The Affordable Care Act changed that.  For those that are currently sick or have been sick in the past, Obamacare is a really big deal.  Insurance companies used to be able to deny coverage or charge more, now they can’t.  Insurance companies used to be able to put lifetime limits on coverage.  Now they can’t.

The end to lifetime limits is another big deal.  I’ve been moved by numerous stories over the years about people, especially children, who have had to endure horrific illness from cancer to brain tumors and the end to lifetime limits has saved their families from financial ruin.

The requirement of preventive care and minimum requirements drives costs down by preventing people from getting sick down the road when the expense rises.

The uninsured rate has gone down considerably due to the affordability and accessibility.  Medicaid and CHIP coverage have also expanded.  Businesses must offer coverage for their employees.  Basically, people get taken care of in ways they didn’t before.  More people have health care than ever before.

But, why the mandate?
Granted, all of this additional coverage costs insurance companies a lot more money.  The sicker a patient is, the more money this is going to cost insurance companies.  This is why insurance companies traditionally denied those with pre-existing conditions or dropped them when they became sick.  Enter the mandate.  If insurance companies have to cover more, they need more policy holders which is part of why all people, even the traditionally healthy, must purchase insurance.  Otherwise, people would just wait until they got sick to purchase insurance which would truly “break the bank.”   The mandate was originally introduced in 1989 by the Heritage Foundation and was championed by conservative economists and Republican senators.

Why people hate it.
For some, it didn’t go far enough to prevent the rise in health care costs which have surpassed income growth for years.  While ObamaCare has slowed the rise in healthcare costs and premiums aren’t rising at the rate anticipated, they continue to rise and they are expensive!  It turns out that quality plans that meet minimum requirements cost more than plans that could drop you when you got sick or kick you out of the hospital.

To pay for the program, it raised taxes on high earners (the 2% making more than $250,000/year) and the healthcare industry.  People don’t like the mandate because they don’t like being told what to do.  Especially, the young and healthy who could go without and now have to pay for insurance.  

Some have called a job killer because companies would force their employees to part-time to avoid paying health care costs.

Smaller government advocates say it is an overreach of the government into people’s lives.

The biggest myths about ObamaCare:

Myth:  ObamaCare is causing premiums to increase.
Fact:  Health insurance premiums have been increasing at outrageous rates for years, long before ObamaCare.  ObamaCare has done a lot to curb premiums, like using the Health Insurance Marketplace to shop around for insurance.  As mentioned earlier, insurance companies have raised their rates as a result of offering quality plans that meet minimum requirements.  

Myth:  ObamaCare is killing jobs and increasing the deficit.
Facts:  The Affordable Care Act actually pays for itself through tax increases on insurance companies and high earners and spending reduction.  It has led to a deficit reduction.  As cited in my post on the economy, the deficit has shrunk every year Obama has been in office.  There is no evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that that the law has had an impact on part-time workers seeking full-time work.  Again, as noted in my post on the economy, there have been 75 straight months of private sector job growth.

Medicaid:
What is Medicaid?  Medicaid is the government insurance program for people whose incomes are insufficient to pay for health insurance.  ObamaCare expanded Medicaid coverage to families whose incomes are up to 133% of the federal poverty level.  This would have covered about 15 million more families.  But, a bunch of states actually rejected that expansion.  Over half of the nation’s uninsured population lives in the states that did not adopt Medicaid expansion.

Why did they reject it?  The federal government subsidizes 100% of of the expansion through 2016, but that subsidy tapers to 90% by 2020.  The states that rejected it say that their 10% of their responsibility does not work within their budgets. Studies have shown that rejecting the expansion will actually cost states more due to increased spending on uncompensated emergency care that would have otherwise been covered by Medicaid.

Medicaid is the only option for many low-income Americans.  And, the truth is many people don’t want to use tax dollars to pay for those who can’t afford insurance.  But, the flip side of that is that taxpayers are responsible for tens of millions of dollars in unpaid medical bills for those who can’t afford insurance and turn to emergency rooms for care when they are out of options.

 Adopted the Medicaid expansion
 Medicaid expansion under discussion
 Not adopting Medicaid expansion



Here are the candidate positions (which anyone who has followed an ounce of the election would likely know.)

Clinton:  Clinton defends the Affordable Care Act and wants to build on it and move to the next level of making premiums more affordable and lessening out-of-pocket healthcare expenses for those buying insurance on the Marketplace Exchanges. She wants to slow the overall growth of health costs (including prescription drug costs-spending on this rose from 2.5% in 2013 to 12.6% in 2014), and lower out-of-pocket costs like co-pays and deductibles.  She also wants to transform the system to reward value and quality of care.

She has a plan to encourage states to expand Medicaid coverage.  She wants to invest in marketing to make enrollment easier as many are eligible, but don’t know it.  She believes that anyone who wants to be able to buy into the Affordable Care Act should be able to, regardless of immigration status (currently undocumented immigrants cannot.)  She supports a “public option” (government run health care to work in competition with private companies) as a way to reduce costs and broaden choices.

Trump:  Trump calls ObamaCare and incredible economic burden.  He perpetuates the myth that ObamaCare is responsible for increased costs and higher premiums.  He also claims there is less competition and fewer choices.  He says it has raised the economic uncertainty of every American.  He proposes repealing the whole thing:  the prevention of denying someone due to pre-existing conditions, the prevention of imposing lifetime limits, the prevention of dropping someone when they are sick, the established minimum requirements, the requirements of covered preventive care and screening, the expanded Medicaid eligibility, and more.  All of it.  This is a Day 1 priority for him.

His alternative:  free-market healthcare completely free of government regulation.  Without government regulations, insurance companies can go back to denying people with pre-existing conditions or making their costs unattainable.  Without government regulation, it is basic supply and demand determined by insurance companies and the people.

My bottom line:  I believe that affordable health care is a basic human right which is why I support the Affordable Care Act.  I believe a government that is for the people is going to do more to ensure affordable and accessible health care than insurance companies that are for a profit.  There is much to be done to improve the health care system and we all have our horror stories, but the repeal of ObamaCare would be a step in the wrong direction.  Obamacare isn’t perfect, but it brought about much progress in the healthcare system and has saved lives and saved good people struck by horrible health scares from finacial ruin or lack of care.  That matters to me.  I value people more than I value any argument I have come across against the Affordable Care Act.